Approach to the future
|
|
|
Scenario and symbolism
|
|
| |
|
|
The future is more metaphor than prediction in this film. Patched together and distorted, the future has an undercurrent of irrationality, resembling that of Brazil, also by Terry Gilliam.
|
|
| |
|
Ratings
|
 |
|
Futurism: 6
|
|
| |
|
|
Entertainment: 7
|
|
|
Apocalypse approaches obliquely in this multi-layered, disturbing movie.
|
|
| |
|
|
Plausibility: 2
|
|
|
The near-term time travel makes it unlikely; the pandemic alone is quite possible.
|
|
| |
|
Interesting depictions
|
 |
|
Disease:
|
|
|
The global pandemic that kills 99% of the populace is unseen but looms with increasing force. The few scenes of the world abandoned to nature are powerful.
|
|
| |
|
|
In nature, an organism that spreads easily and kills virtually all of its hosts is unlikely, as it would threaten its own survival.
|
|
| |
|
|
But someone could genetically engineer an organism that combines the three necessary characteristics: enough incubation time, lethality, and easy spread. It could be done nowand in fact governments may already have created engineered bioweapons.
|
|
| |
|
|
A government would not employ such a weapon, but millennial cults have proven that they will use whatever capabilities they can acquire.
|
|
| |
|
Other technologies / topics depicted
|
 |
|
Time travel:
|
|
|
In the future, it is possible to send people back in time, and recall them, a remarkable advance to achieve by the 2030s, given the devastated state of civilization.
|
|
| |
|
|
Wholly new physics would have to be discovered to allow this. The circumstantial evidencethat no time travelers have ever been recordedsuggests time travel may never be possible.
|
|
| |
|
|
Futuristmovies.com, © 2001 Josh Calder
|
|